Posts Tagged: evangelism
This review was published in the August 2015 volume of the Journal of Global Christianity.
Jerry Trousdale has a story to tell. As a missionary among African Muslims and Director of an evangelical mission organization, he believes he has discovered the secret to Muslim evangelism.
As a Christian, this is not a book you want to dislike. Stories of true revival, conversion, and the transformation of communities are what one hopes for. Why would I not want these to be true? This is also the kind of book the academic community tends not to read. In my limited experience it is because either they feel they are above a book like this (tragically) or do not understand the type of influence they can have in churches and among missions practitioners (more likely).
The author starts by stating that there is a way of doing evangelism that everyone has missed. Trousdale believes to have the discovered biblical principles and values that have been hidden in plain sight in the pages of the Bible. He commits the first few chapters of his book to explaining the principles and giving illustrative narratives of Christians living out these principles with great success.
Trousdale offers what he calls Jesus’ counterintuitive disciple-making strategies (chapter 2).
Go slow at first in order to go fast later.
Focus on a few to win many.
Engage an entire family or group, not just an individual
Share only when and where people are ready to hear.
Start with creation, not with Christ.
It’s about discovering and obeying, not teaching and knowledge.
Disciple people to conversion, not vice versa.
The new way of doing ministry should be (Chapter 12):
Make intercessory prayer the highest priority
Make disciples who make disciples
Invest time in the right person
Don’t tell people what to believe or do
Never settle for revealing just one dimension of Jesus’ life
Never substitute knowledge about God for an obedience-based relationship with God
Understand that Jesus does impossible things through the most ordinary people
All of these are wonderful suggestions. But are they new? What book on prayer does not make prayer the highest priority? Who does not mentor someone so they can be a mentor? Who does not think through whom to disciple?
None of what are listed above are bad and they seem wise. Starting with creation makes sense for someone with no background in Christian faith. Focusing on a few disciples sounds good. But – are these Jesus’ strategies? Are these the only ones?
There are many problems with this kind of “Jesus only” or Jesus model hermeneutic. It elevates Jesus’ words above the rest of the Bible. As an evangelical that is a problem, since all Scripture is inspired by God. The real question is: Should we take a “Gospels-centered” approach to ministry and our reading of the Bible?
The Crux of the Issue – Hermeneutics
If we take away all the stories Trousdale tells we can boil down a significant critique to one question – how should we read the Bible? This of course is a complex question but from my theological vantage point, Trousdale’s entire system could be misleading.
A “Gospels-centered” approach to reading the Bible takes its cue from classic liberalism and can turn Jesus into merely a moral teacher. The cross becomes part of the message to obey instead of the message that redeems dead sinners. It’s not that Trousdale is liberal, but that he mimics the methodology. Let me just raise one issue: Should we take all of Jesus’ commands as commands for his disciples today? I have no desire to diminish the words of our Lord, but also want to understand them in the context of the story line of Scripture and read them knowing that the Holy Spirit was at work in different authors after the last chapters of the gospels were written. While Trousdale spends a significant amount of time talking about Mathew 10 and Luke 10, he does not include commands found in Matthew 10 such as:
Don’t accept any valuable metals (10:9)
Don’t even take along a bag, two coats, sandals or a staff (10:10)
Inquire who is worthy in a town and stay there (10:11)
Greet the house (10:12)
Bless a worthy house, but take back the blessing from an unworthy one (10:13)
Shake off the dust of your feet if you are not received (10:14)
Surely this alone shows the flaw in this hermeneutic.
This leads to a second issue – the role of the Holy Spirit and the role of teachers in the disciple making process. Trousdale is rightly concerned that missionaries not lord it over new believers. He wants new believers and church leaders to be able to handle the Word of God well. However, his way of addressing the issue is unhelpful. His desire is for everyone to understand the Bible through personal study and discovery. There is very little role, if any, for a teacher to help the infant believer understand what they are reading. To just say that the Holy Spirit will just guide each person has been proven over and over again in church history to lead to the Bible meaning whatever an individual wants.
Obedience based discipleship
As stated above, Trousdale gets all of his insight from the Gospels and with that comes some interesting conclusions. One is that Trousdale encourages the reader to teach people God’s commands so that they can follow them and have their life changed and then be open to the message of Christianity (p. 44). This would seem to be the exact opposite of how the Christian life and evangelistic strategy is thought of in Scripture. Even within the Gospels, can you imagine Jesus going to the Pharisees, who were obedient to the law, taking this route? Peter and others in Acts never preached obedience first. Paul preached to bring about the obedience of faith (Rom 1:5). Should we teach obedience to Christ in order to have people place their faith in Christ? Paul in Athens (Acts 17) and Peter to Cornelius (Acts 10) do not seem to fit Trousdale’s model. Truthfully, the approach of the early church does not appear to have a place in Trousdale’s thinking at all.
Obedience based discipleship is the exact opposite of what I would call affection based disciple- ship. Commands are not enough. The declarations and promises of God in Scripture are used by the Spirit to reorient the heart and mind to real faith, which then fuels obedience. It is gospel-centered, not Gospels-centered ministry that yields sanctification and biblical discipleship (see 2 Cor. 3:18.) Obedience-first discipleship is not biblical.
What is a Church?
This type of book also calls to mind many research questions, but even more so the question of how one defines a church. I will only address one statement: Hundreds of Thousands of Muslims are Falling in Love with Jesus.
What could this possibly even mean? Is Trousdale saying that through the principles in this book, there have been over 100,000 confirmed converts to Christianity from Islam? One leader from Frontiers wrote in a private correspondence that at the time of publication, none of the reported movements happened within places where Frontiers is working. So where is this happening? The numbers given by Trousdale are astounding (pg. 15):
More than 6,000 new churches have been planted among Muslims in 18 different countries.
Hundreds of former sheikhs and imams, now Jesus followers, are boldly leading great movements of Muslims out of Islam.
Fortyâ€five different “unreached” Muslim people groups, who a few years ago had no access to God’s Word, now have over 3.000 new churches among them.
There are problems with statistics like these. Primarily, the author never tells us what he believes a church is, beyond a group of people getting together to read the Bible. That is a flaw. I have seen ministries in India state that they have planted thousands of churches, but when I visited those churches I found 3-4 Hindu women who also “follow” Jesus as one of their gods who meet together twice a year to worship him. I understand the fluid reality of having only newly converted believers in an area, but at some point there should be a critical mass that starts paying attention to the Pastoral Epistles and the rest of the Bible.
Where is the Bible?
While Trousdale spends some time in Jesus’ ministry, his primary hermeneutical foundation is stories of supposed Muslim encounters with Jesus. It is not that stories are bad, but as someone who wants to show that what he is doing is found in Scripture, he would have served himself and the reader much better by leading with Scripture.
Where is the Gospel?
Trousdale does describe people becoming believers, but it is never stated that they heard a message and believed. Rather – they heard a story. Trousdale does speak of “the message of Christ” in multiple places. What was the message that led to faith? It is not that Trousdale denies the gospel as a generous reader could find parts of it scattered throughout the book. One just wonders why this is not central.
Words are Important
Trousdale makes a conscious decision that the reader may not catch as he writes. Non-Muslim background believers are called Christians. Islamic background believers are called Christ-followers. There are two times (which might be a slip by the author) where he labels Muslim Background Believers as Christians (pg. 25). By doing this, Trousdale is revealing what he believes about the nature of conversion what people have called the Insider Movement, which is popular is some evangelical circles. There are many in the Muslim world that would drop the word Christian because of the offense some might take. The motives are good, but we must be careful as to how far one wants to go with this type of thinking.
I can walk away from this book thankful for the call to pray and read the Bible. I can be appreciative that there is a good chance that some of these stories are true. But, I cannot commend this book. If you read it, think about how one should read the Bible and whether stories of supposed conversions should drive how you read it and methods of evangelism and discipleship. Surely the 62 other books in the Bible should play a role in how we do discipleship and evangelism.
One of the things that
troubles me about American society—about North America, and I include Canada in
this, and Western European Christian society, to some extent, but it’s stronger
here; it’s stronger here because of America’s particular heritage—there is a
great deal of anger on the American Right at the moment. Have I thrashed this
one over with you before? Let me just say a little bit about it, because it is
troubling. It’s hard to know what to do.
If you want to make a lot
of money with a Christian book in this country, write a book that says what’s
wrong with America, listing all the bad things that you possibly can on the
Left, demonize the Left. It’ll sell like hotcakes on the Right. If you want to
raise money for Focus on the Family, or a whole lot of other institutions that
are really good institutions in many ways, if they really want to raise a lot
of money in a hurry, let them tell you the worst horror stories of the month.
The money flows in!
Now the reason it does is
because there is so much in this society that feels—with a certain amount of
justification—that all those nasties on the Left are taking away our heritage!
They’re perverting our schools! They’re overthrowing principles of jurisprudence!
They’re making the city unsafe! And so there’s anger—there’s anger seething
through the whole land.
Now contrast that with
the first Christians taking the gospel in the Roman Empire. They were nobodies.
They didn’t have anybody taking away their heritage. They were out to take over
the heritage. They looked around and saw an extremely pluralistic empire, and
they said with Caleb, in effect, “Give us this mountain.” And they kept
witnessing and kept getting martyred, and so on, and there was a revolution,
finally—a spiritual revolution.
But we can’t do that
today. At least we find it very difficult, because we’re so busy being angry
all the time that at the end of the day not only do we lose our credibility
with people on the Left—they start demonizing us back—but we have no energy or
compassion left to evangelize them. When you’re busy hating everybody, and
denouncing everybody, and seeking political solutions to everything, it’s very
difficult to evangelize. Isn’t it? Very hard to be compassionate, to look on
the crowds as though they’re sheep without a shepherd, very hard to look on
them like that when they’re taking away “my heritage.” Do you see?
Yet at the same time,
because it is a democracy, there are things we ought to be doing to draw the
line here and there, even if you understand the laws don’t finally engender
justice. They might preserve it for a while. But finally they’re all broke, and
you have to change the laws. There are things we ought to be doing. There are
faithful things we ought to be doing…
But at the end of the
day, if you can’t do it with compassion, and gently, and leave the doors open
for evangelism, boy, you destroy everything. I think one of the devil’s tactics
with respect to the church on the Right today is to make them so hate everybody
else that at the end of the day they can’t be believed anywhere, not even the
proclamation of the gospel.
Feb. 26, 2013By: Evan Burns
been doing evangelism for years and in all my training, I cannot remember ever
learning how to use the Law in evangelism. In the past, my evangelism efforts have started with telling
someone that God loves them, just mentioning that we are all sinners, and that
if they believe in Jesus they will go to heaven when they die. Of course that is very simplistic, and
I have usually explained it better than that. However, I think many people probably just hear that
simplistic presentation, and never feel convicted of their own sin. I don’t think I have ever really
understood that it’s not enough to say that we are all sinners, and it’s not
enough to say we need to believe in Jesus. There is more that needs to be said, and Luther has helped
me tremendously to see how the Law is necessary for converting the soul. When Luther says, “the Law”, he does
not mean the whole Pentateuch; he means the Ten Commandments. In his understanding, that’s generally
how Scripture understands the Law.
Luther is very clear that we cannot offer the comfort of the gospel
without first leading people to despair of their sin through the Law. The Law wounds, and the gospel
heals. Luther did not want gospel
presentations to be so focused on the wrath of God that people would be fleeing
His wrath out of fear, but he wanted them to flee God’s wrath because they knew
they were sinners and they despaired of their sin. This despair of sin only comes through the conviction of the
Law. I’ve heard it said, “we don’t
want fear-filled converts, but tear-filled converts”. I think this statement reflects Luther’s view of using the
Law to convict and drive the sinner to despair and flee to Christ.
problem in churches today is that there are many false converts who have been wrongly
assured that they are heaven-bound based solely on a past decision or even a
simplistic, rote prayer. When
Charles Finney introduced the altar call and a quick decision card as the
method of leading someone in conversion, this easy-believism morphed through
the generations and today we are reaping what he has sown
in American evangelicalism. The
doctrines of persevering faith and ongoing repentance have been eclipsed by
easy-believism and cheap grace. One
reason why there is so little repentance in new “converts” could be because
their consciences have not been wounded by the law. In order to produce genuine contrition, sinners need to feel
broken under the demands of the law.
Then, and only then, will sinners flee the wrath to come and fly to
Jesus as their Lord, Savior, and Treasure. The use of the law to break the sinner in order to receive
the balm of the gospel was the method of Jesus, Paul, the Apostolic Fathers,
the Reformers, the Puritans, and great preachers such as Spurgeon, Whitefield,
Wesley, Edwards, and Lloyd-Jones. Psalm
119 says: “the law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.”
Feb. 18, 2013By: Evan Burns
Dr. Don Whitney is professor of Biblical Spirituality at the
Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.
He has a great website with helpful resources for growing in biblical
spirituality. I have greatly
appreciated his heart for missions and evangelism, which he sees as part of
mature Christian spirituality. He
has a great resource
with suggestions for how to turn a conversation into an opportunity to share
the gospel. I have found many of
his suggestions very helpful for naturally steering a conversation to the
gospel. I hope you will find his
suggestions fruitful in your evangelistic efforts.
Why should we consider the subject of the sovereignty of God in evangelism?
It is the clear teaching of Scripture.
The doctrine of election and the effectual calling of men to salvation is clear and spoken of often; the Apostles knew this very well and emphasized it!
One’s view of the Sovereignty of God will affect one’s method & approach to evangelism.
If you believe man has the ability to cooperate with God in the matter of faith, by making a decision and ultimately responsible, it will determine your approach to evangelism.
If you believe salvation is all of God and all of grace, that man is spiritually dead, and unable to come to God on his own, this will determine another approach to evangelism.
In the coming weeks we will talk about cautions regarding two wrong views of this, as well as what effect God’s sovereignty should have on evangelism.