Posts Tagged: Missions
In my experience the number one
obstacle people feel when considering missions is money (unless you are
Southern Baptist and want to plant churches). I have met many who feel a
great passion for missions, but when reality sets in and the idea of asking
friends for money. a heavy burden lands on their soul.
For those of you who are
struggling, let me offer a few encouragements.
Some of these you know, but maybe have yet to experience.
- God owns everything and if He is calling you to missions, He
will provide. This is just a simple truth
that can anchor you when you doubt whether you should go. I have believed this with all my heart since
TLI started, and guess what – God has always provided what we needed.
- The network of friendships God gives you is important. If you are the kind of person that does not
keep in touch with people, I promise that if you go to them after not speaking
for 5 years, they will not support you. There
are typically two kinds of donors – one that supports you and ones that are passionate about what you are doing. The
majority of your supporters will be people who love you.
- Look at your request to people as an opportunity for them to
invest in an important ministry. You are
not taking their money, but giving them an opportunity to be blessed by
investing into what you are doing.
- You need a home church that will write the check for a
significant portion of your funding.
Most people heading overseas have 2-3 churches giving more than $500 a
month to serve as a steady base of support.
- You can not just write a letter.
I once read a study that showed that 10% of people respond with support to
a letter while 90% of people will support you if you meet face to face.
- There is help. We
recommend this boot camp, which gives people practical training on how to ask
Hope this helps.
In 1976, Byang H. Kato wrote,
In the African church’s search for theological identity, evangelicals have a great potential for keeping the church evangelical. Practically all the mission societies that have been working in Africa started out as evangelicals. Many of them are still evangelical. Most of the Protestant churches are still evangelical. If adequate leadership is produced now through missions and churches within the evangelical sphere, the church in Africa will have a proper biblical perspective to hand on to forthcoming generations of African Christians.
This statement is the reason I believe that theological education is key to the future of the church in Africa and other parts of the world. When Kato wrote this in 1976, his dream was to see foundations for evangelical theology laid, such that future generations will not drift from it.
For the same reason, the Association of Evangelicals of Africa and Madagascar (AEAM) was formed in 1966. Their goal was to “act as a service organization to promote the evangelical stance of the churches.” Both the AEAM and Kato believed that to achieve such a goal, the training of Africans had to be top priority. Kato said, “Widespread cooperation from evangelicals abroad will boost the cause of evangelical Christianity in Africa.” Unfortunately, Kato died shortly after he wrote these words.
The vision of Kato remains true today both for Africa and any mission context. If evangelical Christianity is to take root anywhere (like Africa), the training of nationals has to be top priority. Yet, this is exactly where we encounter a problem. In the same article, Kato identified a problem area that remains today. When Kato wrote his article, he was struggling to see young Africans trained in order to provide a theologically sound future for the churches of Africa. This is where he met with resistance: Kato found that the promotion of any theology, liberal or evangelical, depended on available finances. He wrote,
Receiving money indiscriminately is one economic advantage of the ecumenical movement. For example, ecumenicals recently received $10,000 from Vatican City for organizing the fifth Assembly in Nairobi. The state church of Germany contributes large sums from its church-taxed funds to promote WCC programs.
Seeing the promotion of ecumenical theology through the availability of finances, he saw the need for evangelical North American churches to adjust their approach to missions in Africa. His suggestion remains true today:
Evangelical churches in North America should take their mission to Africa more seriously. North American churches contributed $393 million in 1972 in support of four thousand missionaries in Africa. By contrast, an appeal was launched by African church leaders in early 1973 to collect $1 million for theological education among the leadership of the ten million evangelical Christians in Africa. . . . Three years have passed, and the contributions from North America are still below $50,000.
This was not a picture that encouraged Kato. One may be tempted to think that this was only a problem in the years 1973-1976, but that is not so. It remains the problem today. It is easier for North American churches to spend more in support of missionaries than to invest in the training of nationals. Yes, sending missionaries can be seen as training of nationals, but this would be to miss Kato’s point. His point was that in addition to the presence of missionaries, Africans should be trained. This would cost a fraction of what it costs to support missionaries, because these Africans hold the key to a stable evangelical African church. One can understand why he concluded;
How can a biblical evangelical theology be promoted in Africa if evangelicals do not catch the vision of developing African leadership in Africa? Just a tithe of the income of an average evangelical church in North America would be enough to put one student through three years of theological training in Africa.
Indeed, Kato was right. It is a good thing to send missionaries and spend millions of dollars to support them in Africa and other places. At the same time, the sending churches can adjust their mission focus such that there is also a push to train national leaders. This is the only way that evangelical Christianity will take root and remain. Looking at the African context, for example, evangelical Christianity is at a low percentage (17.7%). This is not due to lack of missionaries but the lack of well-trained Africans in Africa to promote such a theology.
There is definitely a need to rethink our mission strategies. There can be a balance between supporting missionaries and also making funds available to train nationals who will carry the flag of the gospel and reach the unreached.
Kato’s point that available finances promoted theology in Africa remains true. The widespread liberal theology found in African theology books is a result of funds made available for the training of Africans in liberal schools abroad. For this to be combated, evangelicals must necessarily care enough to invest in the training of nationals who will in turn promote evangelical theology in their various contexts. This can be done by bringing qualified Africans and training them in evangelical schools in America or more importantly, by training them in their own contexts.
Training Leaders International is a single-focused mission agency that seeks to promote evangelical Christianity by training national church leaders in biblical interpretation, theology, and expository preaching. This is done on site without removing the church leaders from their ministry contexts. This is one way to begin to meet the needs identified by Kato.
 The quotations here are taken from Byang H. Kato, “Theological Issues in Africa,” Bibliotheca Sacra, 133 (1976): 142-152.
The question of how to relate the gospel to culture is a question about how to express the gospel message in genuinely cultural and authentic terms while at the same time maintaining the purity of the gospel. Speaking of gospel and culture in the African context, Kato says,
Culture as a way of life must be maintained. It is God’s will that Africans, on accepting Christ as their Savior, become Christian Africans. Africans who become Christians should, therefore, remain Africans wherever their culture does not conflict with the Bible. It is the Bible that must judge the culture. Where a conflict results, the cultural element must give way.”
In relating the gospel to any culture, it is good for the preacher to have an objective, which in this case is to make the gospel relevant without compromising the purity of the gospel.
In the history of missions in West Africa, different approaches have been taken in relating the gospel to culture. One approach believes that there is nothing redeemable in the culture and thus seeks to destroy the cultural practices of the people before establishing Christianity. This is what Pobee calls Tabula rasa. With this approach, Christians were more or less called out of society instead of being redeemed in society. One very different approach is what was called accommodation but now is called adaptation, localization, or indigenization. This view acknowledges that there is “a whole heritage in the non-Christian culture and consciously attempts to come to terms with that heritage” (Pobee 59). Here the missionary makes use of he belief system of the people and builds on what they already know. Yet, everything in the culture cannot be accepted en masse. Wisdom and discernment should be used. Some elements will have to be modified but others will be rejected. Again, Kato notes,
In the African evangelicals’ effort to express Christianity in the context of the African, the Bible must remain the absolute source. The Bible is God’s written Word addressed to Africans —and to all peoples—within their cultural background (Kato, 148).
This second approach has to do with couching the gospel message in genuinely African terms and categories, while at the same time not compromising the truth of the gospel. The point here is that while the gospel remains the same, its truth should be communicated in a culturally relevant manner.
Paying attention to how the gospel is communicated in a culture avoids the concept of working misunderstanding where “a missionary preaches the gospel in very foreign terms and the natives appear to receive it. That is, they may attend church services, obey church regulations, and so on, without any real understanding of what is going on” (Pobee, 59).
The importance of making the gospel relevant in a culture cannot be overstated. Once the gospel is stated in culturally meaningful ways, the people will embrace and own it and no longer see it as a foreign concept. They will embrace Jesus as Savior and Lord of their lives. Bediako writes of this point for Africans;
Once we discover that there is no valid alternative to Jesus Christ, the question is no longer: why should we relate to Jesus of Nazareth who does not belong to our clan, family, tribe and nation? But, how may we understand more fully this Jesus Christ who relates to us most meaningfully and most profoundly in our clan, family, tribe and nation?
It is therefore the duty of the missionary or anyone preaching the gospel in another culture to be able to make the gospel message culturally relevant. How should this be done? While one finds many articles and books on methods of contextualization, I do believe that the preacher needs to be one who knows the gospel message well, knows the cultural context of his ministry, and prays for wisdom to make the message clear without losing an iota of it. I commend Paul’s principle on how to do this as seen in 1 Corinthians 9:19-23.
19 For though I am free from all men, I have made myself a slave to all, so that I may win more. 20 To the Jews I became as a Jew, so that I might win Jews; to those who are under the Law, as under the Law though not being myself under the Law, so that I might win those who are under the Law; 21 to those who are without law, as without law, though not being without the law of God but under the law of Christ, so that I might win those who are without law. 22 To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak; I have become all things to all men, so that I may by all means save some. 23 I do all things for the sake of the gospel, so that I may become a fellow partaker of it (1 Corinthians 9:19-23).
This passage shows Paul’s pattern of ministry to people of different cultures, Jews and Gentiles. Paul made himself a servant (slave) to all with the objective of winning more to Christ (v. 19). He adapted himself to Jewish customs as to win Jews to Christ (cf. Acts 16:3; 18:18; 21:23-24, 26). To those under the law he lived as one under the law (note his qualification of this statement in v. 20) to win those under the law (v. 20). To those without the law, he lived as though without the law (again note qualification of the statement in v. 21) to win those without the law (v. 21). He is weak among the weak in order to win the weak (v. 22a).
He concludes, “I have become all things to all men, so that I may by all means save some” (v. 22b). Paul’s goal is specific, the salvation of some people. He will do whatever it takes (becoming all things to all men) and he will use whatever means or method (“by all means”) for the purpose of saving some people.
Why would Paul want to become all things to all people with all the risk that might come with this practice? One answer already given is that he does it in order to save some. Another way to look at this answer is stated in verse 23, “I do all things for the sake of the gospel, so that I may become a fellow partaker of it.” Paul does what he does because of the gospel, for the purpose of partaking of the benefits of the gospel with those who are saved through his ministry.
It would appear that Paul has a gospel to preach to different kinds of people in different cultures, and he becomes what those people are and uses whatever means necessary in each culture to preach the gospel so as to save some. We could say that while Paul’s gospel does not change, his means of presenting the gospel changes. However, he takes care not to compromise the purity of the gospel itself.
Following Paul’s example, the preacher of the gospel should be willing to make himself a member of the culture in which he is working, so that he can effectively communicate the gospel and save those who believe. He should adapt himself to his cultural setting for the sake of the gospel. There is one unchanging thing in this approach; the gospel. The gospel message will not change but the means of presenting and applying it will change according to the cultural context.
Constant study of the Word of God, culture, and prayer is needed to do this effectively.
 Byang H. Kato, “Theological Issues in Africa,” Bibliotheca Sacra, 133 (1976): 530.
 See the discussion in John S. Pobee, Toward an Africa Theology, (Nashville, TN: Parthenon Press, 1979), 53-80.
 Kwame Bediako, Jesus and the Gospel in Africa: History and Experience, (Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 2004), 32.
What should one do when they hear a report of thousands of people trusting Christ on a short-term missions trip? We love numbers. They encourage us. They show progress. But do the accurately portray what is happening around the world?
Every summer a church from the United States sends out a team to do evangelism in the same area of Tanzania. Every summer they come back with almost the same testimony - 5,000-10,000 people have come to Christ. This has been happening for a number of years.
But if you asked them about the churches, they would have a hard time identifying very many. And here is really the crux of the matter. So if you hear of 50,000 people that have come to Christ and there are very few churches, there are probably very few conversions happening.
If you talk to missionaries on the field, they will tell you that if Muslim evangelists came through the same village the week after the Americans, the same people would raise their hands to convert to Islam.
Numbers don't always accurately portray reality and when we inflate numbers we misrepresent what God truly is doing in the world.
Feb. 2, 2016By: Evan Burns
Continued from the previous post, these are
the remaining five words of advice from Adoniram Judson for missionary
Sixthly. Beware of the greater reaction which will take
place after you have acquired the language, and become fatigued and worn out
with preaching the gospel to a disobedient and gainsaying people. You will sometimes long for a quiet retreat,
where you can find a respite from the tug of toiling at native work—the
incessant, intolerable friction of the missionary grindstone. And Satan will sympathize with you in this
matter; and he will present some chapel of ease, in which to officiate in your
native tongue, some government situation, some professorship or editorship,
some literary or scientific pursuit, some supernumerary translation or, at
least, some system of schools; anything, in a word, that will help you, without
much surrender of character, to slip out of real missionary work. Such a temptation will form the crisis of your
disease. If your spiritual constitution
can sustain it, you recover; if not, you die.
Seventhly. Beware of pride; not the pride of proud men,
but the pride of humble men—that secret pride which is apt to grow out of the
consciousness that we are esteemed by the great and good. This pride sometimes eats out the vitals of
religion before its existence is suspected. In order to check its operations, it may be
well to remember how we appear in the sight of God, and how we should appear in
the sight of our fellow men, if all were
known. Endeavor to let all be known. Confess your faults freely, and as publicly as
circumstances will require or admit. When
you have done something of which you are ashamed, and by which, perhaps, some
person has been injured (and what man is exempt?), be glad not only to make
reparation, but improve the opportunity for subduing your pride.
Eighthly. Never lay up money for yourselves or your
families. Trust in God from day to day,
and verily you shall be fed.
Ninthly. Beware of that indolence which leads to a
neglect of bodily exercise. The poor
health and premature death of most Europeans in the East must be eminently
ascribed to the most wanton neglect of bodily exercise.
Tenthly. Beware of genteel living. Maintain as little intercourse as possible
with fashionable European society. The
mode of living adopted by many missionaries in the East is quite inconsistent
with that familiar intercourse with the natives which is essential to a
missionary. There are many points of
self-denial that I should like to touch upon; but a consciousness of my own
deficiency constrains me to be silent. I
have also left untouched several topics of vital importance, it having been my
aim to select such only as appear to me to have been not much noticed or
enforced. I hope you will excuse the
monitorial style that I have accidentally adopted. I assure you, I mean no harm. In regard to your inquiries concerning
studies, qualifications, etc., nothing occurs that I think would be
particularly useful, except the simple remark, that I fear too much stress
begins to be laid on what is termed a thorough classical education. Praying that you may be guided in all your
deliberations, and that I may yet have the pleasure of welcoming some of you to
these heathen shores, I remain
Edward Judson, The Life of Adoniram
Judson (New York: Anson D. F. Randolf & Company, 1883), 578-579; Francis Wayland, A Memoir of the Life and Labors of the Rev. Adoniram Judson, D.D.
(Boston: Phillips, Samson, and Company, 1853), 2:39-41.